October 5, 2011

Review by Trina L. DrotarParis Poems

THE PARIS POEMS
by Suzanne Burns

BlazeVOX
303 Bedford Avenue
Buffalo, NY 14216 USA
ISBN 9781609640460
2010, 84 pp., $16.00
www.blazevox.org

Suzanne Burns’ The Paris Poems is a tour of Paris via popular culture. Jim Morrison reappears throughout the collection while Louis Vuitton and Quasimodo figure prominently in others. Burns addresses Coco Chanel, and in “Walking with Victor Hugo,” compares her love for this man to the Americans’ belief that they love Mary Shelley. This collection, however, is not about popular culture or necessarily about Paris, but these poems could not have been written without incorporating both because they are the vehicles Burns uses to comment on how we travel at times, how we love at others, and how we view the world. This collection is thoroughly enjoyable at every turn, and I have had the pleasure of rereading several poems. Burns blends history with contemporary society and tells stories that ask us to think.

I have a fascination with Paris, and I picked this book up because of the title and because of the cover, which is primarily shades along the gray scale with a simple pink stripe near the bottom quarter of the cover where the title and author’s name appear. The focus of the cover for me is the elongated shadow of the person walking across the stone street. It is not clear to me whether the walker is male or female, and it doesn’t matter to me. It intrigued me enough to open the book, and I was certainly not disappointed. The cover, especially the shadow figure, acted as a guide at times.

The collection begins, appropriately, with “Arrival,” which advises travelers to “always arrive in Paris / on a Sunday afternoon / the skeleton of this fastened city / will become your bones.” Images and lines like these are what bring the greatest joy as I move through the book. She moves here from light lines that seem cheery and like something a guide might suggest to the third and fourth lines which become heavier, primarily through her use of sound and rhythm. By arriving on a Sunday, the traveler can perhaps view the city without the paintings, the souvenirs, and without the window dressing. “It’s just you and these abandoned streets,” writes Burns.

Her word choice is always interesting. The streets in this poem are “abandoned,” and she writes to arrive “with an empty heart.” I want to know why the streets have been abandoned, and I’ve always heard that Paris is for lovers, is the city of love, so it seems odd that I should be asked to arrive empty-hearted, yet the narrator later says that “you will feel alone among millions / fall in love with things / you never allowed yourself to see.” These lines are wonderful, yet I am left with a sense of foreboding, that perhaps reveals itself in the next poem, “Paris Can Never Be Our Poem,” where Burns writes that “it’s an ailment to mythologize / this European host.” She places Paris not in France, the country, but in Europe, the continent. I find this fascinating.

One of my favorite poems is “Louis Vuitton,” and some of my favorite lines are “the Americans [long] to get lost in Paris” and “the Parisians [long] to ignore the Eiffel Tower” and “the Eiffel Tower [longs] to climb to the top of itself and see what all the fuss is about.” Here, Burns seems to say that too often we fail to see the beauty in our own city. When was the last time, she might be asking, we ventured into our own town to see its sights? After reading this poem, I am more inclined to visit the sights within my city that visitors always want to see so that I can discover what makes them special.

In this same poem, Burns shows how the monogrammed souvenirs are not without politics. She writes that “the Champs-Έlysées / can barely contain your name / while China hears the silent sound / of children trained not to scream / when they sew thread into finger bones / making knock-offs of you.” She addresses the American’s need for designer products and the cost, not in dollars, in human suffering.
Throughout this collection, the poems ask us to look, to see, and intimate that we often do not look beyond the surface. Although often complicated by the inclusion of more than one voice or topic, the poems were easy to follow because Burns used her lines as guides, and those lines often made me stop and look a little closer at what was being said.

Near the end of the collection, “Pilgrimage,” a poem dedicated to Jim Morrison, shows the narrator as an American and shows how s/he views different groups of people visiting Morrison’s grave:

There is an eternal wake around Jim’s grave
everyone got the invite
               the assumed R.S.V.P.
the Italians are taking pictures and drinking wine
the Spaniards are smoking pot and crying
the dark man dressed like he stepped
from an avant-garde film
               springs his switchblade
               to slash the heart line of his palm
bleeding himself onto Jim’s final home.
the American are doing what we always do
               littering
               looking at watches
               lamenting the currency exchange
we always commemorate the one who got away.

The collection ends with “Faith,” and leaves us questioning where we place our faith when Burns writes “and how we store the idea of resurrection / in such a dark, brooking place / that seeking our fortune in a gypsy’s ring / might be enough salvation.” We look outside of ourselves, seeking something to believe in–Jim Morrison, a gypsy’s ring, monogrammed goods, Paris.

Suzanne Burns takes us through Paris, stopping by some of the most famous locations, and asks us to question our motives at each step. Her word choice is strong, which creates images that will remain long after finishing the book. Each poem is a story unto itself, and the collection is the poetic equivalent of a novel that should be read multiple times and shared.

____________

Trina L. Drotar obtained her MA in English-Creative Writing from CSUS where she studied with Doug Rice, Joshua McKinney, Mary Mackey, and Peter Grandbois. She has worked as editor of Calaveras Station and currently works as editor of Poetry Now. Her reviews and poetry have appeared or are forthcoming in Rattle, Word Riot, Pirene’s Fountain, Ophidian I and II, and Medusa’s Kitchen. She is originally from San Francisco, CA and can be reached at trinaldrotar@gmail.com.

Rattle Logo

June 25, 2010

Review by Trina L. DrotarMissing Her by Claudia Keelan

MISSING HER
by Claudia Keelan

New Issues Poetry and Prose
Western Michigan University
1903 W Michigan Ave
Kalamazoo MI 49008-5200 USA
ISBN 978-1930974869
2009, 79 pp., $15.00
www.amazon.com

Claudia Keelan’s Missing Her opens with an epigraph from Gerrard Winstanley, “The Truth is Always Experimentall,” which sets the tone for this book. Indeed, each poem within is an experiment in truth. Keelan asks us to consider what truth is and how it is presented in poems dealing with subjects as diverse as a father’s loss, the Vietnam War, oil companies, Jesus, and the attacks of September 11, 2001. Keelan plays with words and images in poems like “What is Meant Here By the People,” where she questions the idea of knowledge, of the collective, and of the individual, and she shifts directions, always pointing us forward and back so that we may seek our own truth. Keelan’s title has us ask, “Who is missing?” The answer might be found in “Same Dream,” where she writes, “So I have / Tried to love my first / Self and so she has / Fled me,” but what is missing is not truly a person; rather, it is often the child from the past.

The speaker in many of these poems is seeking the “first self,” that of the child in “What is Meant Here By the People,” or mourning the loss of the same in “Little Elegy (1977-1991).” In “Everybody’s Autobiography,” Keelan weaves history, politics, and the personal more so than in other poems, but it is the final section of this long poem that brings us back to the book’s title and the search for the “first self”—in this case, the speaker’s childhood. Keelan writes, “Since my father’s death, I’ve slowly begun waking to my childhood.” Death does have a way of causing us to stop and reevaluate our lives. So many of the poems contain subject matter that has done the same to people and our nation: death, Hurricane Katrina, the September 11 attacks. In reevaluating our lives, we may look back to our childhood, a time of more innocence and perhaps more knowledge, (according to several poems in this collection), and we may try to recapture that childhood through our own children. In the same poem, the speaker says that she is “waking to [her] childhood in [her] own child’s life, / the driving he loves on video games, a version of the driving [she] loved, asleep / in the backseat.” In these lines, Keelan points us back both to a childhood memory and to the poem, “Grand Theft Auto,” and the speaker’s “little car-thief.”

In fact, in many instances Keelan foreshadows poems to come in this collection and points back to poems we have read. She often does this through repetition of words and phrases. One such reference asks, “Are you my mother?” in the poems, “The Sister Worlds” and “Little Elegy (Eros).” These words and phrases, much like themes of the collective versus the individual weave throughout this collection almost invisibly. Keelan does not try to knock us over like the “human boat” that “came capsizing” in the prefatory poem, “Came Capsizing the Human Boat” or like the “bulldozer” in “Little Elegy (Eros).” That is not to say that Keelan does not use language or images that can be quite forceful. “Are you my mother?” / Said the baby bird to the bulldozer / Hatchlings / this glorious orphanhood!” are lines that cause us to stop and wonder. Why does the baby bird consider the bulldozer its mother, and why would orphanhood be glorious? Keelan stops us again in “Pity Boat,” where she writes, “Nyet in Spanish,” and the speaker is “lying / next to William Blake / in a big rubber raft / & he’s teaching [her] how to love / being dead.” We might ask why she would use a Russian word there, and we might ask why the speaker chose Blake and why they are on a raft and where they are headed, but “William Blake is beyond asking why.” Blake is dead and can’t question.This poem points toward “What is Meant Here By the People” and the speaker’s search for knowledge, which is also the knowledge of how to live.

What is meant here by the people and how to become one
I carried the heavy child across the river
I knew how I meant to be a child
Including knowing how to live
And forgetting the lesser know how
What is meant here by the child
Excludes the possibility of the people

The collective, “the people,” are like Blake in that they do not question, in this case, knowledge. Keelan’s speaker says that the child, which is the missing part, is heavy inside. It is weighed down by the responsibilities of adulthood, perhaps, but it is more than that. It is weighed down by the need to be part of the collective, yet the collective does not have the knowledge of the child. The speaker is willing to carry the heavy load “across the river;” and although we do not know what river, we understand this to be a difficult task.

Keelan writes that “in remembering there is re-membering,” and this idea is also seen in several of her poems where she discusses the Vietnam War, the attacks of September 11, 2001, and Hurricane Katrina, among other lesser known or personal topics. These are more prevalent in the “Little Elegy” poems. In “Little Elegy (Vietnam),” she not only speaks about Vietnam but rather than condemning the troops or even the United States, she re-members this event and speaks about General Westmoreland. It is here, too, that we find some of her word play.

The general was a humanist:
Scratching his head
On his last day
Wondering why, though he killed so many,
The East to the
West
Gave not one bit
More land.

She uses “Westmoreland” in the way we’ve seen her use “knowledge” and “by the people” in other poems. She turns this “Little Elegy” poem around and makes the general the focus. She refocuses the attention of the September 11 attacks in a similar fashion in “Little Elegy (American Justice)”:

The Banker’s family
Was awarded
More than the Fireman’s
& the Stockbroker’s
More than the Cop’s
The Insurance Man
Won out too, over
The small Rosa
Who dusted his many pens,
And all the way down
The many floors, the lives
Were rated, all of those
Who died September 11th.

Rather than focusing on the attacks or their causes or the grief surrounding that time, she chooses to focus on the way “the lives / were rated.”

Missing Her is a pleasure to read. It is a book that doesn’t require multiple reads, but it one that should be read multiple times. Keelan provides us with questions, new ways of viewing ourselves, our lives, our country, our past, and she does it in a most enjoyable way. In Missing Her, the truth is certainly being experimented with, expanded upon, and shown to encompass many forms.

____________

Trina L. Drotar is an English-Creative Writing graduate student at CSUS and the student of Doug Rice, Joshua McKinney, and Peter Grandbois. She has worked as editor of Calaveras Station and currently works as editor of Poetry Now. Her reviews and poetry have appeared or are forthcoming in Word Riot and Medusa’s Kitchen. She is originally from San Francisco, CA and can be reached at trinaldrotar@gmail.com.

Rattle Logo