April 25th, 2012

Link • E-Reviews Leave a Comment

Review by Corinna McClanahan SchroederDream Cabinet by Ann Fisher-Worth

DREAM CABINET
by Ann Fisher-Wirth

Wings Press
627 E. Guenther
San Antonio, TX 78210
ISBN 978-0-916727-93-2
2012, 85 pp., $16.00
www.wingspress.com

Ann Fisher-Wirth, the author of three previous books of poetry, including, most recently, the book-length poem Carta Marina (Wings Press, 2009), returns to the individual poem in all its many forms in her latest collection, Dream Cabinet. Perhaps most stunning to me in this latest project is the breadth of subject material that Fisher-Wirth not only covers but covers well. She grapples with both the personal and the environmental and political, from her own family lineage to the BP oil spill. Through rigorous attention and self-reflection, she makes particular what is national and even global, and she opens individual experience beyond itself to the larger natural world whose cycles exceed the scope of any one life.

The book, divided into three sections, opens first with the prelude “Slow Rain, October.” In the poem, the poet takes her first of many steps outside of time, opting not for the mindless bustle of the day but for stillness: “Sweetness of not making the bed today, / not making the body today, not making / the life today.” Quiet and dissolution become their own kind of work, and the poet finds all that is familiar around her turned strange:

I die now for a little while: even the family photos
in the Welsh cabinet by the bed are strange to me—
parents marrying, parents aging, children small,
children grown, husband and wife
(that’s I) embracing—sixty years of family.

Meanwhile, “three white roses on the Welsh cabinet / open further, ripen, slacken, begin to bruise.” The roses are, of course, our poet too. She sees in the span of framed faces her own place in time, which is a realization of mortality and also the infinite to which we return.

Fisher-Wirth’s investigations into time and family continue in the first section, whose ordering works effectively as the poems journey backwards. We begin in 1982, with the poet traveling abroad with her second husband, all the while imagining “the family [she] broke / to be with [him],” and then we move to 1972, the poet reading Mann all day and suffering the California heat, knowing that her first marriage is ending: “One night she sits till dawn, the door is open, / crickets clamor in the lemon tree, / she is not reading now, just waiting.” Instead of following a narrative forward, then, we trace it back, and so the poems’ order mimics the experience of memory itself, how we carry the past with us, perhaps growing tired under its weight, even as we ceaselessly prod and try to explain it.

We take another step backwards in time with the resonant “1928. Girl Riding,” in which the poet imagines her mother on a train bound for her freshman year of college, being carried “deeper / into twilight’s beautiful estrangement.” The poem ends with a direct address to the mother, which is also a protest against time:

                                                             If you
get off the train you will become my mother,

so don’t, don’t, because then I will lose you:
ride forever through the tender night, as smoke
drifts around your carefully drawn lips and soft hair.

Impressive, again, is Fisher-Wirth’s ordering, as this poem of intimacy is followed by a very different kind of loss, which is the loss of never really knowing: “Heretic Narrative” reads, “[M]other, father, how little / I knew of your lives.” The poet is simultaneously connected to her deceased parents and held irredeemably apart. All the complexity of a lived life is present in these poems, and the multiplicity of emotional responses is held tensely open, never stifled in favor of one narrative.

Midway, the first section reverses its direction–having reached back, the poet now reaches forward to a grandchild, “dream-filled,” “her cells / a riot of growing,” who is, in the poem “Of a Photograph,” in the process of recognizing her own reflection perhaps for the first time. In “Family Gatherings,” too, the poet reaches to her own daughters, grown now, with “lines that are just beginning // to come around their mouths and eyes,” while she herself admits:

The power that will cast me

like a wad of leaves in the muddy river

is growing in me now. So many years I seemed
unchanging, so many years I ran through life.

Lines like this, honest meditations on one’s own mortality, one’s own self which will pass, mark some of the strongest and most poignant moments in the book, as in “Now Vow,” in which the poet admits, “The world makes you no vow. / Flies want what you offer.” In the end, then, what is there to do but enjoy the world: “The hay is white and golden in the wind. / The thistles, crowns of thorn, with light on every sepal.”

The second section is occupied by Fisher-Wirth’s long poem “Dream Cabinet,” written in eighteen sections of varying lengths and forms. The poem is, in essence, a series of observations, mediations, and protestations made during a summer stay on an island in the Stockholm Archipelago. “Dream Cabinet” works much as a fulcrum in the book, continuing the first section’s investigations but also introducing the ecopoetical concerns that continue to gain importance in the third section.

The poem begins with the poet awakened by a nightmare, and as the title indicates, dreams and the dreamlike rhythms of the world–“the lip, lip, lip of the quiet water between the islands”–are crucial to the poem and function simultaneously alongside lines written against very real environmental devastation. Indeed, the poet is working through how she can rectify desiring peace and “the silence of myself” while living in a world in crisis:

Surrounded by trees and water, I want

to be writing of peace, want to be moving into that deeper
harmony where earth and sea and sky seep into, into,

every pulse of my blood. But I keep thinking
to write of peace right now is to be a tourist.

Fisher-Wirth is not afraid either to implicate herself or to say it like it is, and throughout the poem, there are many overt lines of protestation, such as when she aptly warns that “[w]e will tip // the planet past the healing point,” and that “death will be the kind one, yet so plenteous // are our gizmos there will be no silence, no darkness / even in death. The grave, a brightly lit parking lot.”

Such blunt, even instructive moments function as one kind of ecopoetry, but another equally important kind of ecopoetry is closely-paid attention, of which Fisher-Wirth is a master. “Dream Cabinet” traces out Fogdö’s specific northern beauty, where one can “watch the sky that never turns black // grow light again,” and the poet celebrates the specificities of this place–“soft Falun red of the ramshackle summer house / soaking up shadows,” “the scrotal sponginess / of puffballs, luminescence of chanterelles,” “the tight green pinecones [that] ripen like roses.” Most importantly, the poet still yearns to enter the landscape more fully, desiring “[t]o know this place in the fullness of its seasons. / And watch the light on water, day after day, // empty out my everlasting self-regard.” This attention to detail and this insistence on knowing one little space of the world better and better is, at its core, ecopoetry. So too is Fisher-Wirth’s emphasis on putting the self in relation to the grandeur of the larger, nonhuman world.

The third section continues the ecopoetical work of “Dream Cabinet,” relocating us to the American South and Mississippi in particular, where Fisher-Wirth has lived for many years. The section opens with “BP,” which sets phrases from the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling January 2011 Report to the President against Fisher-Wirth’s own lines, revealing the fragility of a ecosystem in which a dragonfly scrubbing “its oiled face” can best be described as “filthy / iridescence” and pelicans “strain forward above the slick but / cannot rise.”

In addition to the destruction of the natural world and animal life, Fisher-Wirth also reveals the human cost of policies and actions that wreck the environment. In “Sweetgum Country,” for example, she writes of a student

burned by the sun
where pesticides sensitized his skin,
those years of his childhood, playing
in Delta cotton fields

and a Tallahatchie swamp where men and women “fish for buffalo, catfish, bass, / despite the fish advisories, the waters laced with mercury.”

Other poems in the third section are equally as political as Fisher-Wirth’s ecological poems. “Army Men,” for example, explores what war does to soldiers, including a student named Isaac, whose “eyelid twitches, small as a waterbug’s / ripples on still water,” and the poet’s own father, whose trauma she learned about only through her mother:

[M]y mother said, when she picked him up
at the Omaha train station, Christmas ’45,
she found him alone on a bench
at the far end of the room, huddled over,
head in his hands. When I asked her what was wrong
she said, If you don’t know I can’t tell you.

From here, the third section transitions, and the book ends with an incredible sense of both openness and fullness, which seem very much the result of being grounded in love and place. The poet, still vulnerable, still searching and prodding, is nonetheless at home. She is at home in her marriage in which, even during the “misery” of a fight, “this man and I are wedded at the marrow.” She is at home, too, in Mississippi where “[t]he scarlet vincas blanch and crumple” and “a strange peace rises.” She is at home even in “this old beadboard house / with its drafts and cracks and currents.” In “If Not, Winter—,” the poet writes of how, after surgery,

I have opened up my brace.
I have propped my betadine-yellow leg

and wrapped my swollen foot in cabbage leaves.
I lie here, simply breathing,
old wood of this house holding me.

Even in recovery, in pain and limited by crutches, the poet praises each element. She praises “the glacial knit of bone, / ebb of lymph, gradual shrinking of elephant skin.” She praises her husband who has cared for her and even “these bandages stuck to my knee” and, finally, “the seasons that slowly heal me.” It is this infectious attention to and appreciation of experience which makes Fisher-Wirth’s personal poems so much bigger than herself, leaving ample room for the reader to enter. She also rightly acknowledges a few pages later, in “Credo,” that, as wonderful as the world is to experience subjectively, it is much bigger than our individual lives:

But the cardinal, the birdsong, do not need you,
to pulse forward into the light. The peaches do not need you,

to swell and soften, dark with the sugars of summer.
Oh you can be the flesh their juices run down,
but you do not make the seed nor the earth it grows in.

Such lines are representative of Fisher-Wirth’s poetry, which celebrates the self and its value but warns us against putting all our stock in that self as well.

In “Over All a Mist of Sweetness,” the second-to-last poem, Fisher-Wirth writes of the “thousands of berries / these warm September days / [which] keep pushing forward,” “the little ones / lin[ing] up, still green, awaiting their turn / to ripen.” This image seems apt for so much of what Fisher-Wirth offers in Dream Cabinet. These berries are redemptive nature which pushes forward even as the earth is environmentally wrecked; these berries are also our lives and the lives of those who came before us and the lives of those who will inevitably follow. Fisher-Wirth has retold the oldest story of where we fit in time’s endless push, and she has done it beautifully well.

____________

Corinna McClanahan Schroeder’s poetry appears or is forthcoming in such journals as Tampa Review, The Gettysburg Review, Copper Nickel, and 32 Poems. She is the recipient of a 2010 AWP Intro Journals Award in poetry and was named a Ruth Lilly finalist in 2011. She holds an M.F.A. from the University of Mississippi and is currently pursuing her Ph.D. at the University of Southern California.

April 20th, 2012

Link • E-Reviews Leave a Comment

Review by J. Scott BrownleeI Live in a Hut by S.E. Smith

I LIVE IN A HUT
by S.E. Smith

Cleveland State University Poetry Center
2121 Euclid Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio 44115-2214
ISBN 978-I-880834-98-5
2012, 62 pp., $15.95
www.csuohio.edu/poetrycenter/

Yes, I have a pretty good idea what beauty is. It survives
alright. It aches like an open book. It makes it difficult to live.

-Terrance Hayes

A week before I read S.E. Smith’s I Live in a Hut, I got a phone call from the director of NYU’s Creative Writing Program offering me a full ride and a completely unexpected fellowship. Shocked, disbelieving, and euphoric, I attended AWP several days later feeling strangely lightheaded and buoyant—both of which are words that aptly describe Smith’s debut collection, a suite of poems that are more concerned with surprise, misdirection, and creative flair than they are with the humdrum, conciliatory, another-day-another-dollar mindset most of us use to get through a prototypical day.

I first opened I Live in a Hut on an American Airlines flight from Chicago back to Austin, which, if you can manage to re-create, is a reading environment for this book I highly recommend. Smith, who has been publishing quirky, Dean-Young-esque poems with titles like “The Pony of Darkness,” “Big Slutty Bear,” and “Becky Home-Ecky and Her Fourteen Boyfriends” for years now, refuses to take about 80% of any given utterance seriously. This results in a first collection that is equal parts farce, diary-esque reflection, and satirical wit. Consistent in her balancing of seemingly incongruent poetic approaches, Smith weaves the ironic, intensely personal, and outrageously hilarious together with a consistent declarative line that makes zany leaps while remaining syntactically careful and clean.

“Un Peu,” a poem bemoaning the French people’s inability to gain weight juxtaposed alongside one of Smith’s failed romances, evidences the poet’s unique ability to work in several registers at the same time (something that is highly admirable, as well as distinct, about her work):

I would like to swap some of my eternity for some
of yours. I don’t know how but I love you so it may
be possible and the French are fat at last. Finally
they are fat. They move slowly, like bears. Maybe now
they’ll leave us alone, maybe now we can get on with it.

I was particularly moved by many of the love poems in I Live in a Hut—finding it easy to identify with their detached, performative, going-through-the-romantic-motions voices because, like them, I felt equally removed from the girl I was currently seeing—the shelf-life of our short-lived relationship made painfully apparent by my upcoming move to New York City.

To throw a tangential, completely out-of-place monkey wrench in this otherwise serious review, I was emotionally compromised when I read I Live in a Hut—in love with a girl I couldn’t stay with after my move to New York City—and there was nothing I could do to change that cosmic fact except read Smith’s book and feel passionately sorry for the speakers of her poems, many of whom lament similarly failed romantic experiences—albeit from a distance, and with a degree of dispassion that I doubted but remained effective, in part because Smith’s poetry evidences how unfortunately elliptical, illusory, and highbrow contemporary poetry expects capital-l Love to be. Aware of this expectation, Smith takes an enormous (and successful) risk by putting romantic expectation on display–poking, prodding, and otherwise dismantling it in these poems, ultimately revealing the vulnerability and concern present in even the most “contemporary” voice.

Heaven forbid our great loves be cliché, and we write honest, unapologetic lines like, “It is getting / dark. I love you,” as Smith does at the beginning of “Sturgeons,” a poem that has more to do with failed romantic interactions (“I propose that we / move on from this place”) and their sexy, metaphysical fallout even before they are allowed to begin (“Deep down I suspect I am a clock-watcher / anxious for this beautiful moment to end”) than it does with sturgeons, the Caspian Sea, or the Ohio River—all of which dominate the surface of what I would argue is the most important, heartfelt poem in the book.

Speaking of hearts . . . I went over to my girlfriend’s apartment when I got back from AWP to try to salvage whatever version of our relationship I could and should have read her Smith’s poem “Happiness,” although I didn’t because I was already too afraid of losing her. It has one of the best opening stanzas I’ve read in quite some time, and served as a welcome distraction from my own failure at attaining happiness during the difficult weeks of What if? after AWP:

Briefly, it is possible. The rain shines down,
the bucket is ready. It makes a nice click,
the last snap on the jacket. It doesn’t have
to be a particular kind of jacket. But it has
to be November, and you must be at the zoo.

I felt more than a bit like the speaker in “Vertical Lake” as well when I left my girlfriend’s apartment later that night, our kissing (and not being able to stop) juxtaposed sharply with the verticality of my body, the rigidity of it, as I forced the car door closed and drove away:

Okay, bye,
I said. I have to get going.

I was dead. It was snowing.
I was going into the vertical lake.

Several days before this it actually did snow in Chicago, and we had texted each other back-and-forth sporadically during AWP, apologizing that we couldn’t play more active roles in one another’s increasingly distant lives (she was on the verge of opening a hip Austin wine and cheese bar that kept her working 60-hour weeks, and I was, obviously, at AWP, meeting NYU students and faculty and trying to decide whether or not I would commit to an MFA.)

Long story short, I did commit. And we did break up. And Smith’s I Live in a Hut remained a beautiful, heartbreaking book throughout this simultaneously necessary and difficult process. While Smith took “history lessons / from a West Virginian horse thief / named Dirk,” I gave two-stepping lessons to the beautiful Jewish/Spanish/French girl I would eventually have to step away from irrevocably—and without even having the ability to repeatedly hurt her, or be hurt by her, or get in our first epic fight (which the unexpected NYU acceptance prevented us from ever having).

“Already we are off to a terrible start,” Smith says at the beginning of “Beauty,” and I couldn’t agree with her more as I thought about all of the possible ways I could manipulate the girl I loved into moving to New York City with me—eventually realizing that to do so would mean acting similarly to the speaker of “Fuck You,” who repeatedly “takes exasperated measures” and “saves [her lover] for later,” comparing his body, with its oils and sugar-sweet taste, to “a pastry . . . in a [metaphorical] bag” of possessiveness.

I had to leave the girl I loved, and Smith’s book—with its insistence on finding grace and beauty in even the most awkward, unfortunate break-ups—helped me understand why. I didn’t want to, but doing so was part of the painful (though altogether necessary) process of fully letting go.

Like the anthropomorphized truth in Smith’s “Your Scrappy Truth,” I “insisted / on taking the high narrow road / out of town.” I simply couldn’t manipulate my girlfriend and ever expect to live with myself afterwards, so I got off the plane (having finished I Live in a Hut) knowing what I had to do, realizing I had to break up with her in order to shatter completely the expectation that she drop everything in her life to accommodate me and my dreams in New York City–where I would be a poet, if only a bad one, in a city full of people far more selfish, witty, and strong-willed, even, than me, and where our hypothetical break-up would probably be three to four times as messy, eight to nine times as heartbreaking, and still—even then—not hold a candle to the raw emotional core burning at the center of Smith’s remarkable first book.

While my Rattle reviews typically tend to focus on the poet rather than his or her audience, in this particular instance I wanted to make clear the connection between Smith’s work and my own life. While such a critical leap might at first seem taboo and/or unwarranted, I think framing this review with a personal narrative is something Smith herself would applaud—her poems being, at their roots, intimate portraits of human awkwardness, honesty, and confusion. I Live in a Hut is a beautiful, delicate, daring, exquisite first effort—whether you identify with my sappy break-up story or not—one that helped me see beyond my own field of vision with a clarity I didn’t possess before reading it. I hope that, in my future writing (and life off the page), I can be half as daring, quick, and imaginative as S.E. Smith is. At the very least, reading her work, I’m encouraged to try.

____________

J. Scott Brownlee is a poet and poetry critic from Llano, Texas. His writing has appeared or is forthcoming in Hayden’s Ferry Review, RATTLE, Tar River Poetry, Front Porch, Mobius: The Journal of Social Change, Writers’ Bloc, Windhover, and elsewhere. Involved with several literary journal start-ups, he was the managing editor and co-founder of both Hothouse and The Raleigh Review. His current writing project, County Lines: The Llano Poems, explores small-town life in the Texas Hill Country.

April 15th, 2012

Link • E-Reviews Leave a Comment

Review by Eric HowardXicano Duende by Alurista

XICANO DUENDE: A SELECT ANTHOLOGY
by Alurista

Bilingual Review Press
PO Box 875303
Tempe AZ 85287-5303
ISBN-13 978-1-931010-72-6
2011, 145 pp., $16.00
www.amazon.com

Xicano Duende offers a summary of the poetic career of bilingual Chicano poet Alurista, with selections starting with Nationchild plumaroja (1972) and continuing to his tenth book of poetry, Tunaluna (2010). Published on the fortieth anniversary of the publication of his first book, Floricanto en Aztlán, this collection is an inspirational exploration of the cultural and political issues that are essential to his personal language, which is also a people’s language.

Some of Alurista’s fluid, sinuous poems are in English, some are in Spanish, and some are a mix. In the 1970s in San Diego when Alurista was writing and teaching there, I eagerly read Floricanto en Aztlán, which has since its publication been assigned the label “experimental.” I place the word in quotation marks because in the Southwestern United States, it is natural for many to mix English and Spanish in a conversation or a sentence. The introduction by Rigoberto Gonzalez explores how Alurista’s poetry embodies the language of Aztlán and celebrates “the Chicano in all of us.” Alurista sometimes directs his polemic at highly specific targets, such as former governer of California Pete Wilson:

                           wilsonitis is an ingrown
                                    epidemic

Other poems are all about the lyricism:

                      abotona tu vientre, maja
easels b ready
                    to capture flight

cherish thigh
        hug torso
                        b one
        with duende within
discover
                    sun risa raza roja

Alurista also connects the personal and the political. One person’s demons are a reflection of an entire people’s struggles:

                  suicide is no longer a personal
                        choice

and in a poem about heroin addiction, he recalls:

                                                                i cook it ‘n’ i wash
            my dish. i cook not for myself. i cook for us cora, zón
            zón. zón. cora. zón. sleep at the wheel burping and
            bumping into police cars frozen in their black and white.

            …

                                                                                 revolution
            is somewhere awaiting to be awakened lovingly and
            mercilessly

In “ya estufas” Alurista calls for revolution:

                                         el cielo colorado
            witnessed a dusk
                                  of murals
                                      painted
            in the spirit
                           of the fallen
            brown dry leaves
                           of autumn
            las cananas en
                           la tarde
            aparecieron and
                           thousands
            of bullets
                           turned
                       to flowers

One of Alurista’s great strengths is his lyrical playfulness, which he enhances by switching languages as needed for sound and sense. For example in “ex-ostion” he begins by exploiting the sonorousness of Spanish:

            ex-ostión, no se diga tiburón,
                         and the shallow waters
            of shellfish para qué preguntar
            si la mariposa nació con alas

then switches to English for the high rhetoric of the conclusion:

                                       desirelessness
            cannot be purchased, invoked
                         or dreamed, falcons do
            not worry about the plunge

This mix of playfulness and seriousness also serves, in Alurista’s many political poems, to humble enemies of la raza and its anarchic freedom. In “convencido,” he concludes: “la sal sudor de nuestro pueblo acribilla cualquier bob osada.” Alurista’s poetry is embodied in and embodies his Chicano language, and Gonzalez appropriately calls Alurista’s puns intralingual rather than interlingual. Alurista’s poetry continues to inspire, and this anthology, with seventeen illustrations and a representative sample from all of his books but one, belongs in the libraries of all poets of the real and imaginary Southwest.

____________

Eric Howard is a magazine editor and former bilingual press editor who has published poetry in Birmingham Poetry Review, Caveat Lector, Conduit, Gulf Stream Magazine, Plainsong, and The Sun. He lives in Los Angeles, where he is a member of the Writers at Work poetry workshop.

April 10th, 2012

Link • E-Reviews 1 Comment

Review by Grace CurtisMake Yourself Small by Michelle Brooks

MAKE YOURSELF SMALL
by Michelle Brooks

The Backwaters Press
3502 52nd Street
Omaha, Nebraska 68104-3506
ISBN 978-1-935218-26-5
2011, 84 pp., $16.00
http://www.thebackwaterspress.org/

You might think of Michelle Brooks’ volume of poetry, Make Yourself small, as the lyric portrayal of Eminem’s Detroit, complete with trailer courts, suicide, rape, violence, death, and guns. The collection evoked a sense of toughness often associated with West Texas and Detroit. Yet the poems drew me in despite their consistently dark subject matter. What kept me reading was not only Brooks’ skillful writing, but the way she conveys a poignant truth about how we adapt to life by forging our unique response to its difficulty.

In the first poem of the book, “Chiggers,” Brooks writes of a time in childhood when she and a friend were warned by the friend’s father to stay close to the trailer because “a woman had been gang-raped four trailers over.” Of an exhibitionist in the neighborhood, she writes in “All Day You Hear Sirens,” “it was the same old story,/someone showing you something/you didn’t want to see, nothing/new.” The lines that follow sum up what I see as the overarching theme of the book, which is Brooks’ own response to the horrific situations portrayed in these poems: “and you think—how can/he stand it in the rain, pants/around his ankles? You shut/him down.” According to Brooks, you shut it down, you make yourself small, small enough to duck the punches life throws at you, small enough to not attract attention.

The bleak subject matter continues throughout the collection. In “A Stranger to Nothing” she writes of a failed marriage, saying of her ex-husband, “He was someone to do things with while/my insides rotted away with thought of my/rape years before.” In this poem, we see a glimpse of a secondary theme: how we integrate accepting–or rather, adapting to–the things we have been taught as children by adults. She goes on in this poem to write these intriguing lines: “You can’t get everything from one person./My mother said that. She didn’t even try and her/divided heart never healed.” In “Bedtime Stories,” Brooks writes, “Men hide under cars, slash a woman’s/tendons so she can’t run, my mother/said” and “we’d play a game before/bed—What would you do if?, each/scenario with just enough opportunity/to escape if you were smart and quick.” In a poem called “Late,” about a grandfather’s abuse of the grandmother, Brooks again demonstrates how childhood experiences create our adult responses. “I could hear yelling through/the trailer window, and nobody knew what/to do so we drove away and left her there/with the only man she had ever loved.” She goes on to write, “Even/then, I understood you couldn’t save someone/unless you were willing to crucify yourself.”

As if speaking to both herself and to her reader, Brooks sums up a potential response to these poems in “You Can’t See It in This Picture.” This is a poem about pain. It is also about what you cannot see in a photograph–or rather what you cannot, or choose not, to see in life’s experiences. In this case it is symbolized by a missing cheap tiara on the head of the subject. Brooks writes, “Linda Lovelace says if you watch/Deep Throat closely, you can see her bruises.” She ends the poem by inviting the reader to “come closer” and then “or don’t,” suggesting that if you choose to, you can look away from the pain. Brooks’ poems enabled me as a reader to look directly at them. Form—-even free form—-places safe boundaries around difficult subject matter in a way that allows the poet to safely verbalize the unspeakable. This is what Brooks does so well in this collection.

In poem after poem, she delves into the dark and seamy side of life; however, the collection is not about these topics, but about how we respond to life. It is also about how we can spend a lifetime trying to heal from a rape, the death of a parent, or from all the things we were wrongly told about the world when we are children. In “Kentucky Derby Day at My Aunt’s House,” Brooks ends by describing how the family argues over the best way to make a Mint Julep, a drink (the life) they all share.

Each year our family
argues about how to make them, each
year they taste the same. It’s a tradition,
my mother says, you can’t watch the Derby
without drinking at least one. It doesn’t matter
if the mint leaves are bruised or crushed, I can’t
drink enough of other things to get the tastes
of the drink we all share out of my mouth.

In the latter part of the book, Brooks continues to write on the subject of rape–“Tailhook,” “Day of the Dead”–and the scar it leaves. She has used poetry to adeptly explore this and her other topics. In reading her collection, I came to an understanding of how she has come to terms with the difficult subject matter and with the contradictions that abound in her life. Some poems worked better for me than others, but overall, she has done a good job of providing the poetic discernment that separates a simple retelling of sordid facts from work that has universal appeal. While there is Detroit-worthy grittiness in this collection that makes the poems interesting, there is also intelligence and compassion and even occasional humor. This prevents the book from being sensational, maudlin, or depressing, and renders it deeply insightful.

____________

Grace Curtis reviews poetry and expounds on the topic of poetry at her website :www.n2poetry.com. Her chapbook, The Surly Bonds of Earth, 2010 was selected by Stephen Dunn as the winner of the Lettre Sauvage poetry contest. Her poems can also be found in numerous journals.

April 5th, 2012

Link • E-Reviews 1 Comment

Review by Alexa MergenDirt Songs: A Plains Duet

DIRT SONGS: A PLAINS DUET
by Twyla M. Hansen and Linda M. Hasselstrom

The Backwaters Press
3502 N. 52nd Street
Omaha, NE 68104-3506
ISBN 978-1-935218-24-1
2011, 147 pp., $16.00
www.thebackwaterspress.com

Birds, friends, plants, events from the newspaper, walks, labor and family populate the poems in Dirt Songs: A Plains Duet. The two poets, Twyla M. Hansen and Linda M. Hasselstrom, compose harmonizing melodies. Mostly free verse, the poems flow sequentially and can also be dipped into at random.

The poets know the places they write of: Nebraska for Hansen in Part One, South Dakota for Hasselstrom in Part Two. The collection starts with Hansen’s “Morning Fog” pointing out that, amidst pollution ad sprawl, “we’re all here now, in early fall walking/over Salt Creek, breathing the collective air, right under our noses.” Hansen and Hasselstrom ask the reader to pay attention, to bluestem, red cedar, opossum, swallow, and old friends. Their poems are simply titled, naming the subject they address, as in “Lettuce,” “Egg,” and “Autumn” or summarizing the poem’s event: “Lost in the City Again,” “Visiting the Nursing Home,” and “Ice Skating on the Dam.” The apparent simplicity defies the depth of feeling achieved. When Hansen writes that “all day the house as if holding its breath” in “My Granddaughter Sick” the reader feels the apprehension surrounding the feverish child while “the moon, a heavy saucer, reclines/pale and cumbersome above the treeline,/this chilled horizon brittle with bare limbs.” In Hasselstrom’s “Making the Best of It,” loss pervades a widow’s move. “In this village where/no one speaks my language,” she writes, “I live in a single room.” Throughout her section of Dirt Song, Hasselstrom addresses the making of a poet’s life. This poem concludes

I watch and write
compact words that seem
to form themselves in lines.
Paragraphs scale the walls.
On the tawny cliff before me,
I witness each day live and die,
and never calculate its whole.

In Hasselstrom’s “I Ain’t Blind and This is What I Think I See,” the speaker is driving the Interstate to a poetry teaching gig. She notices roadkill and trash, the hawk among it, and remembers images, words her father said, and The New Yorker who told her she couldn’t be a poet. Her poems take the reader deep into the past. “Valentine for My Mother” alternates between a Safeway shopping trip and a mother’s last days. Time waves, dropping linearity.

Tomorrow all the blooms
that do not sell will pucker
in the dumpster
brown as the roses whipped
by the cemetery wind
the day after my mother’s burial.
Cut flowers don’t last
I muttered to the mound
above her heart.

In “Finding Mother’s Jewelry,” the speaker wonders about the onyx, opal, rhinestone and coral she finds in a tin while the woman who once wore the pieces is “lain beneath the only stone she owns,/where her name is carved in granite.” The speaker decides to take the “hoard” of jewelry to Goodwill.

Hasselstrom’s poems snag time by pinpointing lives among the passing news. In “On This Day,” a “ragged little dog” dies on December 20th and the speaker notes historical events that occurred the same day: Gershwin’s birthday, a coal mine explosion, a ship’s explosion. “Faces flicker through my mind,” the poet writes, “all the people I have loved/who are dead on this day–/millions I have never known,/lovers, husbands, parents, children,/all dead and remembered or forgotten.”

“When a Poet Dies” showcases the best of the time travel and reflection on writing; the speaker swings between a “lesser” poet passing time and the death of William Stafford, a poet she admires. The refrain “when a poet dies” beats like a heart through the poem.

When a poet dies, no one lowers a flag,
or beats a muffled drum to the cadence
of the poet’s best-known elegy.
When a poet dies, no one leads a riderless horse
down the avenue, spurred boots turned backward.
No one shoots the poet’s typewriter beside the open grave,
tells the bees, frames the family photograph in crape,
hangs a black wreath on the door. Somewhere,
a publisher may nod and think Collected Works.

She brings to the poem’s end a “a mule deer doe stepping off a shelf of ice.”

Read in order, Hansen’s elegies in Part One set the reader up for “When a Poet Dies,” in Part Two. Hansen’s “Work” recalls a time when “we took care of the land; the land took care of us” and reminds that “all honeybees need is pollen and nectar, an unspoiled spring-/fed creek, the occasional gentle hand to encourage them on.” In “Early Walk, Late October,” Hansen’s speaker finds a doe, “its rear legs wrenched beneath” as “the string of traffic swerves, does not slow down.” The poem continues

Pawing her front legs, she struggles to lift the sack
of her body out of harm’s way, her brown eyes
huge in the oncoming headlights. Nobody’s fault.

How many times before, I think, she must have
chanced this clash of nature and development,
survived by the sheer luck of numbers. Late

October, and soon enough, the night will swell
with witches and brooms, clowns and monsters,
the chatter of youth, chill of the unknown.

There’s nothing I can do: crush of tires,
her 200 pounds. I turn and run. Trailing me,
a human-like sound crying out from the wind.

How little and how much a poet can do to gentle the world–that’s what the poems in Dirt Songs show. Poets, the lesser and the great, look at each day and address it. We write of deer, dogs, grandmothers, fathers, lovers, wars, news and breakfast. Like Hansen’s child protagonist in “Small,” every poet is, in a sense, a “small fry in a small town, making small/talk about small-time lives into the small hours.” The poems in Dirt Songs are mugs of drip coffee shared over a scratched table; they are not not tiny cups of cappuccino in a wi-fi cafe. They ask you to roll up your sleeves, stay awake, pay attention, and grab a pen.

____________

Alexa Mergen’s poems appear most recently in The Packinghouse Review, Quill & Parchment, and Verbatim. She lives in Sacramento and works with people locally and long-distance as a writing guide and creativity coach. Her website is: www.alexamergen.com.

Where Am I?

You are currently browsing the E-Reviews category at Rattle: Poetry for the 21st Century.